
Battery vacuum gripper with digital display, 90 kg

- Automatic re-pumping
- Digital pressure display
- One-button start
- 90 kg load capacity
Ranking among 265 gripsters of shape "Oval"
Overview
Battery vacuum gripper with digital display, 90 kg: an electric gripster with an oval suction pad. Its stated load capacity is 90 kg, and it costs around €83. It is sold without a brand name of its own, like many vacuum grippers made in China.
Price and load capacity compared
Among the 265 oval gripsters in this comparison, it is priced slightly above the median of €71. At 90 kg, its load capacity is 170 kg below the typical value for this design (260 kg). That works out at 108 kg of capacity per €100 spent; the median is 341 kg.
Drive and operation
The battery is built in. That saves weight and cost, but means a charging break when it runs flat. It charges via USB-C, so with the same cable and charger as your phone or laptop. A digital display shows the vacuum level and battery charge. If the vacuum drops, the tool automatically pumps back up.
Seal and applications
The sealing lip is rubber. On smooth surfaces such as glass, polished tiles and stone it seals very tightly and lasts a long time; on rough or textured surfaces it is at a disadvantage. According to the data sheet it is suitable for tiles and glass.
Strengths
- Charges via USB-C
- Digital vacuum and battery display
- Automatic re-pump
- Durable rubber seal
Weaknesses
- Lower capacity than most oval models
- Built-in battery, needs charging breaks
Specifications
| Brand | Unbranded |
|---|---|
| Shape | Oval |
| Suction pad | n/a |
| Load capacity (manufacturer rating) | 90 kg |
| Drive | Electric (battery) |
| Battery | Built-in battery |
| Battery capacity | n/a |
| Batteries included | n/a |
| Charging port | USB-C |
| Automatic re-pump | Yes |
| Indicator | Digital display |
| Seal | Rubber |
| Vibration function | No |
| Quantity | 1 |
| Carry case | n/a |
| Brand origin | China |
| Made in | China |
| Applications | Tiles, Glass |
| Price | €83 |
Head-to-head comparisons




Alternatives



