Unbranded · Round

Round electric vacuum lifter, 200 kg, for large glass panels

Identical to 2 other listings1 head-to-head
Round electric vacuum lifter, 200 kg, for large glass panels
Price
€64
Load capacity
200 kg
Suction pad
Round
Per €100
312 kg
200 kgRound
  • 200 kg load capacity
  • For large glass and tile panels

Ranking among 200 gripsters of shape "Round"

Pricetypical value €60
cheaper than 47% of models
Load capacitytypical value 200 kg
more than 14% of models
Capacity per eurotypical value 347 kg
more than 39% of models

Overview

Round electric vacuum lifter, 200 kg, for large glass panels: an electric gripster with a round suction pad. For around €64, the manufacturer quotes a load capacity of 200 kg. It is sold without a brand name of its own, like many vacuum grippers made in China.

Price and load capacity compared

Among the 200 round vacuum lifters in this comparison, it is priced slightly above the median of €60. Its load capacity matches the typical value for this design (200 kg) almost exactly. That works out at 312 kg of capacity per €100 spent; the median is 347 kg.

Seal and applications

The sealing lip is rubber. On smooth surfaces such as glass, polished tiles and stone it seals very tightly and lasts a long time; on rough or textured surfaces it is at a disadvantage. According to the data sheet it is suitable for glass, large-format tiles and tiles.

Strengths

  • Durable rubber seal

Weaknesses

  • Lower capacity than most round models
  • Rubber holds less well on rough surfaces

Specifications

BrandUnbranded
ShapeRound
Suction padn/a
Load capacity (manufacturer rating)200 kg
DriveElectric (battery)
Batteryn/a
Battery capacityn/a
Batteries includedn/a
Charging portn/a
Automatic re-pumpn/a
Indicatorn/a
SealRubber
Vibration functionNo
Quantity1
Carry casen/a
Brand originChina
Made inChina
ApplicationsGlass, Large-format tiles, Tiles
Price€64

Identical listings

This device is sold in practically identical form under 3 names. Prices range from €30 to €64. This listing is €34 more than the cheapest identical device.

See all 3 identical listings

Head-to-head comparisons

Alternatives