Brand comparison
SHALL vs. Antstone
Two vacuum gripper brands in a data comparison: 6 models from SHALL against 3 models from Antstone, with prices, capacity, batteries and features.
The brands in numbers
| SHALL | Antstone | |
|---|---|---|
| Number of models | 6 | 3 |
| Price (median) | €56 | €54 |
| Price range | €52 to €209 | €34 to €77 |
| Capacity (median) | 300 kg | 400 kg |
| Highest load capacity | 300 kg | 400 kg |
| Capacity per €100 (median) | 536 kg | 741 kg |
| Share with removable battery | 17% | 100% |
| Share with digital display | 100% | 33% |
| Share with vibration | 0% | 100% |
| Share with foam seal | 0% | 33% |
| Share with rubber seal | 100% | 67% |
Price and capacity of all models
Each dot is a model. Higher means more capacity, further left means a lower price.
SHALLAntstone
The brands at a glance
SHALL has 6 models in this comparison, Antstone has 3. Both brands come from China.
Prices and load capacity
The median price per lifter is €56 for SHALL (range €52 to €209) and €54 for Antstone (range €34 to €77). Typical load capacity is 300 kg versus 400 kg; the strongest models reach 300 kg and 400 kg respectively. On value for money, Antstone leads with 741 kg per €100, ahead of SHALL (536 kg).
Features and shapes
The feature focus differs: a removable battery on 17 versus 100 percent of models, a digital display on 100 versus 33 percent of models and a vibration function on 0 versus 100 percent of models (SHALL named first). By shape, the SHALL range is 100 percent oval, the Antstone range 100 percent oval.
Models head to head
SHALL models
Antstone models
