Head-to-head · Oval
WORKEASE 300 kg vs. Oval vacuum gripper 300 kg
WORKEASE 10-inch battery gripster with LCD, 4,000 mAh, USB-C vs. Electric vacuum gripper 300 kg with smart display: capacity, price, battery, seal and features compared head to head.
VS
Result by category: 0 : 0
Price
Tie
Load capacity
Tie
Value for money
Tie
Indicator
Tie
Features
Tie
Key figures
WORKEASE 300 kgOval vacuum gripper 300 kg
All data compared
| WORKEASE 300 kg | Oval vacuum gripper 300 kg | |
|---|---|---|
| Price per lifter | €256 | €254 |
| Load capacity | 300 kg | 300 kg |
| Capacity per €100 | 117 kg | 118 kg |
| Shape | Oval | Oval |
| Drive | Electric (battery) | Electric (battery) |
| Battery | Built-in battery | n/a |
| Battery capacity | 4,000 mAh | n/a |
| Charging port | USB-C | n/a |
| Indicator | Digital display | Digital display |
| Seal | Rubber | Rubber |
| Vibration function | No | No |
| Automatic re-pump | n/a | Yes |
| In the box | 1 lifter, carry case | 1 lifter |
| Brand | WORKEASE | Unbranded |
| Brand origin | China | China |
| Made in | China | China |
The two contenders
WORKEASE 300 kg and Oval vacuum gripper 300 kg are two oval vacuum lifters in a similar price class. The head-to-head comparison shows where they differ.
Price and load capacity
Oval vacuum gripper 300 kg is €2 cheaper per lifter at around €254 than WORKEASE 300 kg (€256), which is 1 percent less. Both are rated at 300 kg. Per €100, Oval vacuum gripper 300 kg offers 118 kg of capacity and WORKEASE 300 kg 117 kg.
Battery, charging and display
WORKEASE 300 kg charges via USB-C.
Suction pad, seal and features
Both seal with rubber.
Verdict
On points, the comparison ends in a draw (0:0).
WORKEASE 300 kg
- Charges via USB-C
- Digital vacuum and battery display
- Durable rubber seal
- Comes with a carry case
- More expensive than most comparable models
- Built-in battery, needs charging breaks
Oval vacuum gripper 300 kg
- Digital vacuum and battery display
- Automatic re-pump
- Durable rubber seal
- More expensive than most comparable models
