Head-to-head · Oval
SHALL 300 kg vs. Oval gripster 300 kg
SHALL battery vacuum lifter 300 kg with LCD display vs. Oval electric gripster with dual motor, 300 kg: capacity, price, battery, seal and features compared head to head.
VS
Result by category: 1 : 0
Price
Tie
Load capacity
Tie
Value for money
Tie
Indicator
Tie
Features
SHALL 300 kg
Key figures
SHALL 300 kgOval gripster 300 kg
All data compared
| SHALL 300 kg | Oval gripster 300 kg | |
|---|---|---|
| Price per lifter | €55 | €56 |
| Load capacity | 300 kg | 300 kg |
| Capacity per €100 | 545 kg | 536 kg |
| Shape | Oval | Oval |
| Drive | Electric (battery) | Electric (battery) |
| Battery | Removable battery | n/a |
| Indicator | Digital display | Digital display |
| Seal | Rubber | Rubber |
| Vibration function | No | No |
| In the box | 1 lifter, carry case | 1 lifter |
| Brand | SHALL | Unbranded |
| Brand origin | China | China |
| Made in | China | China |
The two contenders
SHALL 300 kg and Oval gripster 300 kg are two oval vacuum grippers in a similar price class. The head-to-head comparison shows where they differ.
Price and load capacity
Both cost about the same, around €55. Both are rated at 300 kg. Per €100, SHALL 300 kg offers 545 kg of capacity and Oval gripster 300 kg 536 kg.
Suction pad, seal and features
Both seal with rubber.
Verdict
On points, SHALL 300 kg wins 1:0. SHALL 300 kg is the better choice if features and what comes in the box matter most to you.
SHALL 300 kg
- A lot of capacity per euro
- Removable battery: no waiting while charging
- Digital vacuum and battery display
- Durable rubber seal
Oval gripster 300 kg
- A lot of capacity per euro
- Digital vacuum and battery display
- Durable rubber seal
