Head-to-head · Round

Round vacuum lifter 203 mm 200 kg vs. Round vacuum lifter 203 mm 200 kg

Electric 8-inch (203 mm) vacuum lifter with 1,800 mAh battery vs. Electric 8-inch (203 mm) vacuum lifter with 1,800 mAh battery: capacity, price, battery, seal and features compared head to head.

Result by category: 0 : 0

Price
Tie
Load capacity
Tie
Value for money
Tie
Battery & charging
Tie
Features
Tie

Key figures

Round vacuum lifter 203 mm 200 kgRound vacuum lifter 203 mm 200 kg
Load capacity
200 kg
200 kg
Price per lifter
€69
€69
Capacity per €100
290 kg
290 kg
Battery capacity
1,800 mAh
1,800 mAh

All data compared

Round vacuum lifter 203 mm 200 kg Round vacuum lifter 203 mm 200 kg
Price per lifter€69€69
Load capacity200 kg200 kg
Capacity per €100290 kg290 kg
Suction padØ 203 mmØ 203 mm
ShapeRoundRound
DriveElectric (battery)Electric (battery)
BatteryBuilt-in batteryBuilt-in battery
Battery capacity1,800 mAh1,800 mAh
Charging portUSB-CUSB-C
SealRubberRubber
Vibration functionNoNo
In the box1 lifter, 1 battery1 lifter, 1 battery
BrandUnbrandedUnbranded
Brand originChinaChina
Made inChinaChina

The two contenders

Round vacuum lifter 203 mm 200 kg and Round vacuum lifter 203 mm 200 kg are two round gripsters in a similar price class. On paper they look similar, but there are clear differences in the details.

Price and load capacity

Both cost about the same, around €69. Both are rated at 200 kg. Per €100, Round vacuum lifter 203 mm 200 kg offers 290 kg of capacity and Round vacuum lifter 203 mm 200 kg 290 kg.

Battery, charging and display

Both use a built-in battery. Both charge via USB-C.

Suction pad, seal and features

Both seal with rubber. The suction pads measure Ø 203 mm and Ø 203 mm.

Verdict

On points, the comparison ends in a draw (0:0).

Round vacuum lifter 203 mm 200 kg

  • Charges via USB-C
  • Durable rubber seal
  • Lower capacity than most round models
  • Built-in battery, needs charging breaks
  • Rubber holds less well on rough surfaces

Round vacuum lifter 203 mm 200 kg

  • Charges via USB-C
  • Durable rubber seal
  • Lower capacity than most round models
  • Built-in battery, needs charging breaks
  • Rubber holds less well on rough surfaces

More head-to-heads