Head-to-head · Round
Round vacuum gripper 203 mm 200 kg vs. Round vacuum gripper 200 kg
Electric 8-inch vacuum gripper, 200 kg, USB-C, battery vs. Electric vacuum gripper 200 kg for large glass panels: capacity, price, battery, seal and features compared head to head.
VS
Result by category: 0 : 0
Price
Tie
Load capacity
Tie
Value for money
Tie
Features
Tie
Key figures
Round vacuum gripper 203 mm 200 kgRound vacuum gripper 200 kg
All data compared
| Round vacuum gripper 203 mm 200 kg | Round vacuum gripper 200 kg | |
|---|---|---|
| Price per lifter | €64 | €64 |
| Load capacity | 200 kg | 200 kg |
| Capacity per €100 | 312 kg | 312 kg |
| Suction pad | Ø 203 mm | n/a |
| Shape | Round | Round |
| Drive | Electric (battery) | Electric (battery) |
| Battery | Built-in battery | n/a |
| Charging port | USB-C | n/a |
| Seal | Rubber | Rubber |
| Vibration function | No | No |
| In the box | 1 lifter | 1 lifter |
| Brand | Unbranded | Unbranded |
| Brand origin | China | China |
| Made in | China | China |
The two contenders
Round vacuum gripper 203 mm 200 kg and Round vacuum gripper 200 kg are two round vacuum lifters in a similar price class. The head-to-head comparison shows where they differ.
Price and load capacity
Both cost about the same, around €64. Both are rated at 200 kg. Per €100, Round vacuum gripper 203 mm 200 kg offers 312 kg of capacity and Round vacuum gripper 200 kg 312 kg.
Battery, charging and display
Round vacuum gripper 203 mm 200 kg charges via USB-C.
Suction pad, seal and features
Both seal with rubber.
Verdict
On points, the comparison ends in a draw (0:0).
Round vacuum gripper 203 mm 200 kg
- Charges via USB-C
- Durable rubber seal
- Lower capacity than most round models
- Built-in battery, needs charging breaks
- Rubber holds less well on rough surfaces
Round vacuum gripper 200 kg
- Durable rubber seal
- Lower capacity than most round models
- Rubber holds less well on rough surfaces
