Head-to-head · Round
Round vacuum gripper 203 mm 200 kg vs. Round gripster 200 kg
Electric 8-inch (203 mm) vacuum gripper with digital display vs. Electric gripster 200 kg for smooth and rough surfaces: capacity, price, battery, seal and features compared head to head.
VS
Result by category: 0 : 0
Price
Tie
Load capacity
Tie
Value for money
Tie
Features
Tie
Key figures
Round vacuum gripper 203 mm 200 kgRound gripster 200 kg
All data compared
| Round vacuum gripper 203 mm 200 kg | Round gripster 200 kg | |
|---|---|---|
| Price per lifter | €61 | €61 |
| Load capacity | 200 kg | 200 kg |
| Capacity per €100 | 328 kg | 328 kg |
| Suction pad | Ø 203 mm | n/a |
| Shape | Round | Round |
| Drive | Electric (battery) | Electric (battery) |
| Battery | Built-in battery | n/a |
| Indicator | Digital display | n/a |
| Seal | Rubber | Rubber |
| Vibration function | No | No |
| In the box | 1 lifter | 1 lifter |
| Brand | Unbranded | Unbranded |
| Brand origin | China | China |
| Made in | China | China |
The two contenders
Round vacuum gripper 203 mm 200 kg and Round gripster 200 kg are two round vacuum grippers in a similar price class. Both promise a secure hold on tiles and panels, but they differ in the details.
Price and load capacity
Both cost about the same, around €61. Both are rated at 200 kg. Per €100, Round vacuum gripper 203 mm 200 kg offers 328 kg of capacity and Round gripster 200 kg 328 kg.
Suction pad, seal and features
Both seal with rubber.
Verdict
On points, the comparison ends in a draw (0:0).
Round vacuum gripper 203 mm 200 kg
- Digital vacuum and battery display
- Durable rubber seal
- Lower capacity than most round models
- Built-in battery, needs charging breaks
- Rubber holds less well on rough surfaces
Round gripster 200 kg
- Durable rubber seal
- Lower capacity than most round models
- Rubber holds less well on rough surfaces
