Round gripster 203 mm 250 kg vs. Round vacuum lifter 203 mm 250 kg
Manual gripster 203 mm with gauge, 250 kg vs. 8-inch vacuum lifter, 250 kg, hand pump with gauge: capacity, price, battery, seal and features compared head to head.
Result by category: 1 : 0
Key figures
All data compared
| Round gripster 203 mm 250 kg | Round vacuum lifter 203 mm 250 kg | |
|---|---|---|
| Price per lifter | €55 | €56 |
| Load capacity | 250 kg | 250 kg |
| Capacity per €100 | 455 kg | 446 kg |
| Suction pad | Ø 203 mm | Ø 203 mm |
| Shape | Round | Round |
| Drive | Manual pump | Manual pump |
| Battery | No battery | No battery |
| Charging port | not applicable | not applicable |
| Indicator | Analog gauge | Analog gauge |
| Seal | Rubber | Rubber |
| Vibration function | No | No |
| Automatic re-pump | No | n/a |
| In the box | 1 lifter, carry case | 1 lifter |
| Brand | Unbranded | Unbranded |
| Brand origin | China | China |
| Made in | China | China |
The two contenders
Round gripster 203 mm 250 kg and Round vacuum lifter 203 mm 250 kg are two round gripsters in a similar price class. On paper they look similar, but there are clear differences in the details.
Price and load capacity
Both cost about the same, around €55. Both are rated at 250 kg. Per €100, Round gripster 203 mm 250 kg offers 455 kg of capacity and Round vacuum lifter 203 mm 250 kg 446 kg.
Suction pad, seal and features
Both seal with rubber. The suction pads measure Ø 203 mm and Ø 203 mm.
Verdict
On points, Round gripster 203 mm 250 kg wins 1:0. Round gripster 203 mm 250 kg is the better choice if features and what comes in the box matter most to you.
Round gripster 203 mm 250 kg
- A lot of capacity per euro
- Durable rubber seal
- No battery needed, always ready
- Comes with a carry case
- Rubber holds less well on rough surfaces
- Vacuum has to be pumped by hand
Round vacuum lifter 203 mm 250 kg
- Durable rubber seal
- No battery needed, always ready
- Rubber holds less well on rough surfaces
- Vacuum has to be pumped by hand
