Round gripster 203 mm 200 kg vs. Round vacuum lifter 203 mm 200 kg
Electric 8-inch gripster, 200 kg, with removable batteries vs. Electric 8-inch vacuum lifter, 200 kg, digital display: capacity, price, battery, seal and features compared head to head.
Result by category: 1 : 0
Key figures
All data compared
| Round gripster 203 mm 200 kg | Round vacuum lifter 203 mm 200 kg | |
|---|---|---|
| Price per lifter | €90 | €91 |
| Load capacity | 200 kg | 200 kg |
| Capacity per €100 | 222 kg | 220 kg |
| Suction pad | Ø 203 mm | Ø 203 mm |
| Shape | Round | Round |
| Drive | Electric (battery) | Electric (battery) |
| Battery | Removable battery | n/a |
| Indicator | Digital display | Digital display |
| Seal | Rubber | Rubber |
| Vibration function | No | No |
| In the box | 1 lifter, 2 batteries, carry case | 1 lifter |
| Brand | Unbranded | Unbranded |
| Brand origin | China | China |
| Made in | China | China |
The two contenders
Round gripster 203 mm 200 kg and Round vacuum lifter 203 mm 200 kg are two round vacuum grippers in a similar price class. Both promise a secure hold on tiles and panels, but they differ in the details.
Price and load capacity
Both cost about the same, around €90. Both are rated at 200 kg. Per €100, Round gripster 203 mm 200 kg offers 222 kg of capacity and Round vacuum lifter 203 mm 200 kg 220 kg.
Suction pad, seal and features
Both seal with rubber. The suction pads measure Ø 203 mm and Ø 203 mm.
Verdict
On points, Round gripster 203 mm 200 kg wins 1:0. Round gripster 203 mm 200 kg is the better choice if features and what comes in the box matter most to you.
Round gripster 203 mm 200 kg
- Removable battery: no waiting while charging
- Digital vacuum and battery display
- Durable rubber seal
- Comes with a carry case
- Lower capacity than most round models
- More expensive than most comparable models
- Rubber holds less well on rough surfaces
Round vacuum lifter 203 mm 200 kg
- Digital vacuum and battery display
- Durable rubber seal
- Lower capacity than most round models
- More expensive than most comparable models
- Rubber holds less well on rough surfaces
