Head-to-head · Round

Round gripster 200 kg vs. Round gripster 200 kg

Electric gripster with numeric display, 200 kg vs. Electric gripster 200 kg with gauge, removable battery: capacity, price, battery, seal and features compared head to head.

Result by category: 1 : 0

Price
Tie
Load capacity
Tie
Value for money
Tie
Indicator
Round gripster 200 kg
Features
Tie

Key figures

Round gripster 200 kgRound gripster 200 kg
Load capacity
200 kg
200 kg
Price per lifter
€67
€67
Capacity per €100
299 kg
299 kg

All data compared

Round gripster 200 kg Round gripster 200 kg
Price per lifter€67€67
Load capacity200 kg200 kg
Capacity per €100299 kg299 kg
ShapeRoundRound
DriveElectric (battery)Electric (battery)
Batteryn/aRemovable battery
Charging portn/aExternal charger
IndicatorDigital displayAnalog gauge
SealRubberRubber
Vibration functionNoNo
In the box1 lifter1 lifter
BrandUnbrandedUnbranded
Brand originChinaChina
Made inChinaChina

The two contenders

Round gripster 200 kg and Round gripster 200 kg are two round gripsters in a similar price class. Both promise a secure hold on tiles and panels, but they differ in the details.

Price and load capacity

Both cost about the same, around €67. Both are rated at 200 kg. Per €100, Round gripster 200 kg offers 299 kg of capacity and Round gripster 200 kg 299 kg.

Battery, charging and display

Round gripster 200 kg charges with an external charger. For the indicator, Round gripster 200 kg relies on a digital display, Round gripster 200 kg on an analog gauge.

Suction pad, seal and features

Both seal with rubber.

Verdict

On points, Round gripster 200 kg wins 1:0. Round gripster 200 kg is the better choice if a good vacuum indicator matter most to you.

Round gripster 200 kg

  • Digital vacuum and battery display
  • Durable rubber seal
  • Lower capacity than most round models
  • Rubber holds less well on rough surfaces

Round gripster 200 kg

  • Removable battery: no waiting while charging
  • Durable rubber seal
  • Lower capacity than most round models
  • Rubber holds less well on rough surfaces