Raizi X3 vs. Tile Rite 210 mm 130 kg
Raizi X3 battery vacuum gripper with digital display, 140 kg vs. Tile Rite battery gripster 210 mm, 130 kg, with digital display: capacity, price, battery, seal and features compared head to head.
Result by category: 3 : 0
Key figures
All data compared
| Raizi X3 | Tile Rite 210 mm 130 kg | |
|---|---|---|
| Price per lifter | €112 | €114 |
| Load capacity | 140 kg | 130 kg |
| Capacity per €100 | 125 kg | 114 kg |
| Suction pad | n/a | Ø 210 mm |
| Shape | Oval | Round |
| Drive | Electric (battery) | Electric (battery) |
| Indicator | Digital display | Digital display |
| Seal | Rubber | Rubber |
| Vibration function | No | No |
| Automatic re-pump | Yes | n/a |
| In the box | 1 lifter | 1 lifter |
| Brand | Raizi | Tile Rite |
| Brand origin | China | United Kingdom |
| Made in | China | n/a |
The two contenders
Raizi X3 (oval) and Tile Rite 210 mm 130 kg (round) take different approaches to pad shape in a similar price class. Both promise a secure hold on tiles and panels, but they differ in the details.
Price and load capacity
Raizi X3 is €2 cheaper per lifter at around €112 than Tile Rite 210 mm 130 kg (€114), which is 2 percent less. On load capacity, Raizi X3 leads with 140 kg, while Tile Rite 210 mm 130 kg reaches 130 kg. Per €100, Raizi X3 offers 125 kg of capacity and Tile Rite 210 mm 130 kg 114 kg.
Suction pad, seal and features
Both seal with rubber.
Verdict
On points, Raizi X3 wins 3:0. Raizi X3 is the better choice if high load capacity, lots of capacity per euro and features and what comes in the box matter most to you.
Raizi X3
- Digital vacuum and battery display
- Automatic re-pump
- Durable rubber seal
- Lower capacity than most oval models
Tile Rite 210 mm 130 kg
- Digital vacuum and battery display
- Durable rubber seal
- Lower capacity than most round models
- More expensive than most comparable models
- Rubber holds less well on rough surfaces
More head-to-heads
