Procci 300 kg vs. Tile Rite 210 mm 130 kg
Procci battery gripster 300 kg with dual motor and LCD vs. Tile Rite battery gripster 210 mm, 130 kg, with digital display: capacity, price, battery, seal and features compared head to head.
Result by category: 2 : 0
Key figures
All data compared
| Procci 300 kg | Tile Rite 210 mm 130 kg | |
|---|---|---|
| Price per lifter | €114 | €114 |
| Load capacity | 300 kg | 130 kg |
| Capacity per €100 | 263 kg | 114 kg |
| Suction pad | n/a | Ø 210 mm |
| Shape | Oval | Round |
| Drive | Electric (battery) | Electric (battery) |
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | n/a |
| Indicator | Digital display | Digital display |
| Seal | Rubber | Rubber |
| Vibration function | No | No |
| In the box | 1 lifter | 1 lifter |
| Brand | Procci | Tile Rite |
| Brand origin | China | United Kingdom |
| Made in | China | n/a |
The two contenders
Procci 300 kg (oval) and Tile Rite 210 mm 130 kg (round) take different approaches to pad shape in a similar price class. Both promise a secure hold on tiles and panels, but they differ in the details.
Price and load capacity
Both cost about the same, around €114. On load capacity, Procci 300 kg leads with 300 kg, while Tile Rite 210 mm 130 kg reaches 130 kg. Per €100, Procci 300 kg offers 263 kg of capacity and Tile Rite 210 mm 130 kg 114 kg.
Suction pad, seal and features
Both seal with rubber.
Verdict
On points, Procci 300 kg wins 2:0. Procci 300 kg is the better choice if high load capacity and lots of capacity per euro matter most to you.
Procci 300 kg
- Digital vacuum and battery display
- Durable rubber seal
Tile Rite 210 mm 130 kg
- Digital vacuum and battery display
- Durable rubber seal
- Lower capacity than most round models
- More expensive than most comparable models
- Rubber holds less well on rough surfaces
More head-to-heads
