Head-to-head · Round

NOVASTRY 203 mm 200 kg vs. Round vacuum lifter 200 kg

NOVASTRY electric 8-inch gripster, 200 kg, digital display vs. Battery vacuum lifter with digital display and re-pumping, 200 kg: capacity, price, battery, seal and features compared head to head.

Result by category: 0 : 0

Price
Tie
Load capacity
Tie
Value for money
Tie
Indicator
Tie
Features
Tie

Key figures

NOVASTRY 203 mm 200 kgRound vacuum lifter 200 kg
Load capacity
200 kg
200 kg
Price per lifter
€34
€33
Capacity per €100
588 kg
606 kg

All data compared

NOVASTRY 203 mm 200 kg Round vacuum lifter 200 kg
Price per lifter€34€33
Load capacity200 kg200 kg
Capacity per €100588 kg606 kg
Suction padØ 203 mmn/a
ShapeRoundRound
DriveElectric (battery)Electric (battery)
BatteryRemovable batteryn/a
Charging portExternal chargern/a
IndicatorDigital displayDigital display
SealRubberRubber
Vibration functionNoNo
Automatic re-pumpn/aYes
In the box1 lifter, carry case1 lifter
BrandNOVASTRYUnbranded
Brand originChinaChina
Made inChinaChina

The two contenders

NOVASTRY 203 mm 200 kg and Round vacuum lifter 200 kg are two round gripsters in a similar price class. The head-to-head comparison shows where they differ.

Price and load capacity

Both cost about the same, around €34. Both are rated at 200 kg. Per €100, Round vacuum lifter 200 kg offers 606 kg of capacity and NOVASTRY 203 mm 200 kg 588 kg.

Battery, charging and display

NOVASTRY 203 mm 200 kg charges with an external charger.

Suction pad, seal and features

Both seal with rubber.

Verdict

On points, the comparison ends in a draw (0:0).

NOVASTRY 203 mm 200 kg

  • Low price for its design
  • A lot of capacity per euro
  • Removable battery: no waiting while charging
  • Digital vacuum and battery display
  • Lower capacity than most round models
  • Rubber holds less well on rough surfaces

Round vacuum lifter 200 kg

  • Low price for its design
  • A lot of capacity per euro
  • Digital vacuum and battery display
  • Automatic re-pump
  • Lower capacity than most round models
  • Rubber holds less well on rough surfaces

More head-to-heads