Fafeicy 90 kg vs. QEP Xtreme 75024
Fafeicy electric vacuum gripper 90 kg with digital display vs. QEP Xtreme 75024 electric 8-inch gripster, 120 kg: capacity, price, battery, seal and features compared head to head.
Result by category: 1 : 2
Key figures
All data compared
| Fafeicy 90 kg | QEP Xtreme 75024 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price per lifter | €54 | €55 |
| Load capacity | 90 kg | 120 kg |
| Capacity per €100 | 167 kg | 218 kg |
| Suction pad | n/a | Ø 203 mm |
| Shape | Oval | Round |
| Drive | Electric (battery) | Electric (battery) |
| Battery | Built-in battery | Built-in battery |
| Charging port | n/a | USB-C |
| Indicator | Digital display | Digital display |
| Seal | Rubber | Rubber |
| Vibration function | No | No |
| In the box | 1 lifter, carry case | 1 lifter |
| Brand | Fafeicy | QEP |
| Brand origin | China | USA |
| Made in | China | China |
The two contenders
Fafeicy 90 kg (oval) and QEP Xtreme 75024 (round) take different approaches to pad shape in a similar price class. The head-to-head comparison shows where they differ.
Price and load capacity
Both cost about the same, around €54. On load capacity, QEP Xtreme 75024 leads with 120 kg, while Fafeicy 90 kg reaches 90 kg. Per €100, QEP Xtreme 75024 offers 218 kg of capacity and Fafeicy 90 kg 167 kg.
Battery, charging and display
Both use a built-in battery. QEP Xtreme 75024 charges via USB-C.
Suction pad, seal and features
Both seal with rubber.
Verdict
On points, QEP Xtreme 75024 wins 2:1. Fafeicy 90 kg is the better choice if features and what comes in the box matter most to you. QEP Xtreme 75024 makes its case if high load capacity and lots of capacity per euro are more important.
Fafeicy 90 kg
- Digital vacuum and battery display
- Durable rubber seal
- Comes with a carry case
- Lower capacity than most oval models
- Built-in battery, needs charging breaks
QEP Xtreme 75024
- Charges via USB-C
- Digital vacuum and battery display
- Durable rubber seal
- Lower capacity than most round models
- Built-in battery, needs charging breaks
- Rubber holds less well on rough surfaces
More head-to-heads
